Deraa: The Judiciary Scheme, Shape of laws in it since its Liberation

Deraa: The Judiciary Scheme, Shape of laws in it since its Liberation

Enab Baladi Enab Baladi
Untitled-633gr.jpg

Deraa: Armed Factions Sabotage the House of Justice

The judicial houses began in Hawran in the form of miniature Sharia boards set up in villages, cities, and strips. The earliest of these boards were: The Sharia board in the Middle Strip, the Medical Court, al-Giza and al-Masyfert Court. The situation later settled on the existence of three courts simultaneously, (Gharaz Court, al-Qawabir Court that was subordinate to al-Nura Front, Jalyn Court that was subordinate to the Islamic al-Mouthna Movement). Later on, these different courts aligned in addition to other independent factions to form “Justice Courthouse.” At present, it is the only court existent in Hawran.

According to Osama Al-Yatim, the head of the court, “the courts’ performances at that time can be characterized as judicially weak and duality in the judiciary as a result of the multiplicity of courts. At the same time, it was characterized by a strength in implementing adjudications because each court was subordinate to a strong faction. On the 10th October 2014, the Justice House was launched. It is formed of independent jurists, legalists, and administrative persons who are not subordinate to any faction internally or externally. The Justice House depends in its finances on donations from some of the brigades. There is no connection between it and the Interim government.”

Ad

Judicial Reference of Hawran’s Justice Court House

dara-300x300When the Justice Court House was founded, no particular laws were relied on. Rather approved on courts’ charters and courts’ filings were relied on. According to al-Yatim, at present the Unified Arab laws are relied on as one of the main judicial references and the law will be worked on soon.

Military Brigades try to sabotage the Justice Court House after the Liberation of Deraa

The Justice Court House has tried to be fully independent from the hegemony of the military brigades but it has been forced to placate these brigades. It has to placate them as “establishing justice and deterring tyranny,” is considered a collaborative action between the courts and the brigades in the absence of state institutions. According to the testimony of Judge Osama al-Yatim, until now the brigades play a negative role in the work of the Justice Courthouse. Their negative role manifests in their lack of cooperation with the Justice Courthouse in executing court decisions, weakening the response to court decisions, and withholding the necessary, and large, funding that the judiciary requires to function fully.

With respect to arrests and summons, al-Yatim confirmed that the Justice Courthouse is officially responsible for these. Summons are only executed with an official warrant, and the court has a force/authority specialized in summons. However, due to disturbances some brigades have committed transgressions by arresting persons of their own accord.

The Judicial Courthouse in Hawran is One of the most Successful Judicial Experiences on a National Scale

In all the liberated areas, the recent nature of the judicial experience is one of the biggest obstacles that courts face. In addition to the many “calamities” that require qualified judges. Cultivating the judiciary to meet the current needs, requires long periods of stability and repeated training. Additionally, the current judiciaries in place lack the necessary police force to maintain security and execute court decisions. Other than these, the current judiciary bodies face a weakness/lack of funding whereby their overall funding is limited to some donations.

According to the testimonies of many of jurists, the Justice Courthouse in Hawran is considered, until this point in time, one of the most successful judicial experiences on a national scale. Those working in the Courthouse are institutionalizing it for the Courthouse to become a cornerstone of the Ministry of Justice in the future Syria.

In the recent Conference of the Judicial Boards that was convened in Reyhani in Turkey, the Judicial Courthouse alongside the unified judiciary in Eastern Ghouta achieved first place. The Courthouse was honoured with the agreement to establish an institute to prepare judges. Preparations to build the institute are currently underway.

continue all topic:

Prominent Judicial Bodies Formed in Liberated Syria

The Phase of Regression: ‘Sheikhs’ Replacing Judges

Peoples’ Courts in Autonomous Administrated Regions

Free Independent Syrian Judiciary Council

Three Authority References Warn of the Division of Syria

Syrian State Law: will its continued implementation help maintain the unity of Syrian territory?

Islamic Sharia: Military Brigades Reject Legal References and Insist on the Implementation of Sharia

The Unified Arab Law: Demands for its implementation as a Middle Ground between Syrian State Law and Islamic Sharia

Judicial Schemes and the Shape of Laws in Areas outside the control of the Syrian Regime

Judiciary in Aleppo is unable to counter the Hegemony of the Military

Rehabilitative Program for Prisoners in Aleppo

Deraa: The Judiciary Scheme, Shape of laws in it since its Liberation

Eastern Ghouta: Foundation of Independent Judiciary following Liberation

Judiciary is absent from Western Ghouta and Sharia Implementation in Qalamoon

Jaysh al-Fateh Promises to implement a Unified Judicial Reference in Idlib

Al-Nusra Front Controls Judiciary in Lattakia Countryside

Hama Countryside: Absence of Judiciary and Subordination of Khan Sheyhun court

Al-Waer court and resolving dispute by consensus in Homs

Judiciary in Deir ez-Zor terminated by ISIS

Attempts at founding Judiciary in Raqqa were terminated by ISIS

Judiciary System under Baath Rule

 How do Syrians value courts’ performance and Judiciary in their liberated areas?

Killing Justice in the North of Syria

Higher Judiciary Institute in Aleppo: First Graduates in Liberated Areas

Top